Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18081 - 18090 of 49832 for our.
Search results 18081 - 18090 of 49832 for our.
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
. Stat. Rule 809.25(3). According to our long-standing procedure, we simply remanded to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16162 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. Rule 809.25(3). According to our long-standing procedure, we simply remanded to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16162 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1995). However, in our review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137813 - 2015-03-18
(1995). However, in our review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137813 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723133 - 2023-10-31
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723133 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on a claim of newly discovered evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137519 - 2017-09-21
on a claim of newly discovered evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
failed to formally find a factual basis for his plea before proceeding to sentencing. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
failed to formally find a factual basis for his plea before proceeding to sentencing. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reject this argument because, as Turner correctly states, our supreme court has held that filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947932 - 2025-04-30
reject this argument because, as Turner correctly states, our supreme court has held that filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947932 - 2025-04-30
Joseph C. Pierce v. Ronald K. Colwell
.2d 681, 689, 495 N.W.2d 327, 330-31 (1993), our supreme court set out “some or all” of the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10680 - 2005-03-31
.2d 681, 689, 495 N.W.2d 327, 330-31 (1993), our supreme court set out “some or all” of the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
failed to formally find a factual basis for his plea before proceeding to sentencing. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
failed to formally find a factual basis for his plea before proceeding to sentencing. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
to our discussions and need not be set forth in this opinion. Nos. 99-1107-CR 99-1108-CR 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15442 - 2017-09-21
to our discussions and need not be set forth in this opinion. Nos. 99-1107-CR 99-1108-CR 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” ¶4 In considering a sentencing challenge, our review is limited. We will uphold the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27239 - 2014-09-15
.” ¶4 In considering a sentencing challenge, our review is limited. We will uphold the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27239 - 2014-09-15