Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18111 - 18120 of 49833 for our.
Search results 18111 - 18120 of 49833 for our.
State v. Frank A. H.
. was not prejudiced by counsel’s performance. We agree. On this record, “our confidence in the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31
. was not prejudiced by counsel’s performance. We agree. On this record, “our confidence in the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence sustains them, and we may not substitute our discretion for that of the Board’s, as committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77630 - 2012-02-07
of the evidence sustains them, and we may not substitute our discretion for that of the Board’s, as committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77630 - 2012-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and for failing to call two witnesses. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
, and for failing to call two witnesses. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 Village of Hales Corners was erroneously denied. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735751 - 2023-12-05
2 Village of Hales Corners was erroneously denied. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735751 - 2023-12-05
State v. Gary Mahlum
N.W.2d at 25 n.3. FELON IN POSSESSION COUNTS We confine our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14403 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 25 n.3. FELON IN POSSESSION COUNTS We confine our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14403 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard Dakota
window evidence in evaluating counsels performance." Our review of the record fails to reveal any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13706 - 2005-03-31
window evidence in evaluating counsels performance." Our review of the record fails to reveal any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13706 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald J. Rucks v. George Burnett
misses the mark. The starting point for our inquiry is the original judgment granting the prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
misses the mark. The starting point for our inquiry is the original judgment granting the prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeriline Campbell
our independent review of the undisputed facts, we conclude that under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
our independent review of the undisputed facts, we conclude that under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randall McConochie
because “[t]he scope of constitutional protections, representing the basic value commitments of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19
because “[t]he scope of constitutional protections, representing the basic value commitments of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel P.
other factors—personal accountability, the need for public protection, and rehabilitation. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21
other factors—personal accountability, the need for public protection, and rehabilitation. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21