Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
Arizona agent had contacted him and advised that Thomas had tested positive for THC and had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Ofc. Rivera’s “observations, later confirmed by Officer Donahue’s testing of the windows” were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324724 - 2021-01-20

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
, 574 N.W.2d 222 (1998), wherein we applied a two-part “catalyst test” to determine whether to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12358 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the police officer lacked the reasonable suspicion necessary to conduct field sobriety tests (FSTs). ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307115 - 2020-11-24

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Cooper
a breath or blood alcohol test, and was ultimately charged with OWI-5th, OAR-2nd, being a habitual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 158
, the parties agree that the first and second prongs of the relation-back test have been met; thus, the sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74073 - 2014-09-15

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Eugene S. Calhoun
had been brought because of "politics" and that the blood test on which it was based was "nonsense
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16921 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terrance J. O'Neill
Wis. 2d 409, 414, 523 N.W.2d 106, 109 (Ct. App. 1994). We employ two tests to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5078 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the prejudice prong of this two-prong test, the defendant must demonstrate that counsel’s errors were “so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34977 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Willy J. Love
test for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims requires defendants to prove: (1) deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16164 - 2017-09-21