Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18151 - 18160 of 91511 for 1.
Search results 18151 - 18160 of 91511 for 1.
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
authority of §§ 66.96[1] and 66.98,[2] Stats., as well as Village of DeForest Ordinance 11.03(8).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14325 - 2005-03-31
authority of §§ 66.96[1] and 66.98,[2] Stats., as well as Village of DeForest Ordinance 11.03(8).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14325 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 For the reasons that follow, we summarily reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 For the reasons that follow, we summarily reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04
State v. Shaun A. Costello
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth County: michael s. gibbs, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3572 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth County: michael s. gibbs, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3572 - 2005-03-31
Paul R. Horvath v.
AGAINST HORVATH Opinion Filed: October 1, 1997 Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17292 - 2005-03-31
AGAINST HORVATH Opinion Filed: October 1, 1997 Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17292 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark W. Sterling, pro se, appeals the orders denying his Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark W. Sterling, pro se, appeals the orders denying his Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
State v. James R. Bolstad
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Raymond
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, P.J. 1 Daniel T. Raymond appeals pro se from a forfeiture judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5301 - 2017-09-19
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, P.J. 1 Daniel T. Raymond appeals pro se from a forfeiture judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5301 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Russell w. stamper, Reserve Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Russell w. stamper, Reserve Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
State v. Daniel T. Raymond
of the circuit court for Walworth County: Robert J. Kennedy, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Walworth County: Robert J. Kennedy, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
application contrary to §§ 29.642(1), Stats.[1] He makes two arguments for reversal: (1) he took no "overt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14795 - 2005-03-31
application contrary to §§ 29.642(1), Stats.[1] He makes two arguments for reversal: (1) he took no "overt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14795 - 2005-03-31