Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18181 - 18190 of 59340 for quit claim deed.

State v. Drazen Markovic
. He claims the trial court erred: (1) because his postconviction attorney should have raised a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31

State v. Opheous L. Simmons
, asserted the existence of a new factor requiring resentencing and claimed his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8180 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the trial court may deny the motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18

State v. Joseph Williams
to meet his burden of proof in his ineffective assistance of counsel claim; and that the thirty-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
. He requests a new trial in the interests of justice. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2982 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Rodney A. King
postconviction relief. King claims the circuit court committed two errors on appeal: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15582 - 2017-09-21

Charles A. Ghidorzi v. Steven J. Pergande
an existing disputed claim; it constitutes a defense to an action to enforce the claim.” Flambeau Products
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18816 - 2005-06-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals an order denying his motion for resentencing. Shingleton claims that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528902 - 2022-06-08

Citizens for the Preservation of the St. Croix, Inc. v. Riviera Airport, Inc.
. (Citizens) lack standing to pursue the zoning claim under § 59.97(11),[3] and the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12106 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rodney A. King
. King claims the circuit court committed two errors on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15582 - 2005-03-31