Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 41627 for she's.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 41627 for she's.
COURT OF APPEALS
for the law when he or she understood and correctly stated the law but ignored it. City of Madison v. Local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
for the law when he or she understood and correctly stated the law but ignored it. City of Madison v. Local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
State v. Gerald W. Knudtson
., removing her pants and his pants. He attempted to insert his penis into her vagina. She believes he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10977 - 2005-03-31
., removing her pants and his pants. He attempted to insert his penis into her vagina. She believes he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10977 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
or she did not understand the constitutional rights being waived. See generally id. at 139-40, 569 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12759 - 2005-03-31
or she did not understand the constitutional rights being waived. See generally id. at 139-40, 569 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jacqueline M. Grosshans v. William J. Grosshans
-time paralegal was $23,091. She could earn about $46,000 per year if she were working full time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25803 - 2017-09-21
-time paralegal was $23,091. She could earn about $46,000 per year if she were working full time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25803 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald W. Knudtson
with S.R.S., removing her pants and his pants. He attempted to insert his penis into her vagina. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10978 - 2017-09-19
with S.R.S., removing her pants and his pants. He attempted to insert his penis into her vagina. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10978 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Bernice Spiegelberg v. State
and special verdicts for determining the damages under the before and after analysis she offered. The court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20161 - 2017-09-21
and special verdicts for determining the damages under the before and after analysis she offered. The court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
separate occasions. On three of those occasions she was pregnant with his child, and on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12448 - 2017-09-21
separate occasions. On three of those occasions she was pregnant with his child, and on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12448 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tammy F.
of this appeal.[1] Tammy makes two central arguments. First, she contends that § 48.293
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
of this appeal.[1] Tammy makes two central arguments. First, she contends that § 48.293
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alan W. Gursky
and struck her just after she parked her car and was attempting to leave it. She resisted and ended up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13214 - 2005-03-31
and struck her just after she parked her car and was attempting to leave it. She resisted and ended up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13214 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that each of those periods were more than 120 consecutive days. ¶5 Volker testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
that each of those periods were more than 120 consecutive days. ¶5 Volker testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14