Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18251 - 18260 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] NOTICE
period by simply agreeing with the Administrative Law Judge’s No. 2005AP274 2 assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27381 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 768, 596 N.W.2d 749 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107529 - 2017-09-21

State v. Paul H. Gates
, Grant County Deputy Sheriff Jack Johnson. Johnson and several other law enforcement officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
After hearing Smart’s testimony, the trial court declined to rule that, as a matter of law, Smart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22

[PDF] State v. Mark S. Mielke
. The State appeals an order suppressing evidence obtained by a law enforcement officer who entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4616 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
The Wisconsin Constitution provides in relevant part: “Except as otherwise provided by law, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106120 - 2014-01-02

[PDF] NOTICE
of law reviewed de novo by this court. See State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis. 2d 389, 391, 362 N.W.2d 162 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
question of law and fact.[3] We will uphold the trial court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50176 - 2010-05-17

COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law which we review de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25

State v. Robert M. Lewis
. Law enforcement officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by merely approaching an individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14960 - 2005-03-31