Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18351 - 18360 of 49854 for our.

[PDF] WI APP 71
to serve in the county jail. It is inconsistent with the statutes and our precedent to interpret WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146979 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
., 184 Wis. 2d at 600-01. The petition fails on both requirements. ¶6 Our supreme court addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108947 - 2014-03-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentences. Hudson contends that our decision in State. v. Wolfe, 2001 WI App 66, 242 Wis. 2d 426, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89521 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
Donald Harman has not appealed from the referee's report or that recommendation. Accordingly, our
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18712 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
and convincing evidence that consent was voluntary. Id. at 237-38. Our review is of the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34524 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
judgment dismissing Wingo’s action for damages and injunctive relief. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197489 - 2017-10-04

CA Blank Order
Nelson eligible for expungement was appropriate. Our review of the sentencing transcript leads us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112455 - 2014-05-12

Frontsheet
in Wisconsin. The referee approved the stipulation. No appeal has been filed. ¶2 Upon our independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“remained pretty much trouble free” and that Downs “complies with rules and expectations of our patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95080 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the issue Wiegand raises concerning our independent review of the video recording. See State v. Castillo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77607 - 2012-02-06