Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18411 - 18420 of 69626 for as he.

[PDF] NOTICE
counsel’s effectiveness. He first challenges postconviction counsel’s failure to raise the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33898 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
provided the license plate number of the Jeep and stated the vehicle had fled when he attempted to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
story, he was lying, and his account did not match the physical evidence. Czysz argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21

WI APP 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP823-CR Complete Title ...
assault of a child.[1] Thomas asks us to overturn his convictions because he claims that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97268 - 2013-06-25

[PDF] State v. Fontaine Baker
of first-degree reckless homicide while armed, following a jury trial. He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19

Jennifer Louise Kunert v. Lyle Herman Kunert
a gun on me," and in the struggle to get the gun away from her, he pushed her through a wall.[3] Lyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11196 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Nancy Johnson Carrick v. Lawrence L. Foster
, and he has continued to provide accounting and financial advising services for the group. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11096 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 78
sexual assault of a child.1 Thomas asks us to overturn his convictions because he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15

State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
husband and Mark Krumplitsch’s brother-in-law, testified that he observed Krumplitsch and Porth burning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey R. Schertz
. He contends there was insufficient evidence to uphold the jury verdict on the charge of resisting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15619 - 2005-03-31