Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18451 - 18460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 18451 - 18460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Bank of New York v. David H. Mills
(the Millses), appeal an order of the trial court confirming the sale of their mortgaged property to the Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6502 - 2017-09-19
(the Millses), appeal an order of the trial court confirming the sale of their mortgaged property to the Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6502 - 2017-09-19
Bank of New York v. David H. Mills
. Mills (the Millses), appeal an order of the trial court confirming the sale of their mortgaged property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6502 - 2005-03-31
. Mills (the Millses), appeal an order of the trial court confirming the sale of their mortgaged property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6502 - 2005-03-31
Frank P. Holzberger v. Evelyn C. Holzberger
, the trial court also appointed a guardian ad litem for Evelyn.[1] ¶4 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18537 - 2005-06-13
, the trial court also appointed a guardian ad litem for Evelyn.[1] ¶4 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18537 - 2005-06-13
State v. Keith E. Pischke
was directed to the district attorney and thus comes within the purview of the statute. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8536 - 2005-03-31
was directed to the district attorney and thus comes within the purview of the statute. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8536 - 2005-03-31
Melvin R. Smith, Jr. v. Linda A. Smith
the trial court’s determination.[1] Because the record demonstrates the trial court reasonably exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6826 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s determination.[1] Because the record demonstrates the trial court reasonably exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith E. Pischke
the purview of the statute. The trial court found, however, that the offer to plead in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8536 - 2017-09-19
the purview of the statute. The trial court found, however, that the offer to plead in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8536 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective by: (1) failing to object to admission of the videotape
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225845 - 2018-10-30
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective by: (1) failing to object to admission of the videotape
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225845 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Fleming
, the trial court rejected Fleming’s arguments. Fleming appeals to this court from the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10893 - 2017-09-20
, the trial court rejected Fleming’s arguments. Fleming appeals to this court from the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10893 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Mollie Place v. City of Milwaukee
). Place claims that this case should be remanded for a new trial because: (1) the assistant city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20
). Place claims that this case should be remanded for a new trial because: (1) the assistant city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for seventh-offense OWI, and an order denying his postconviction motion.[1] Luedtke argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
for seventh-offense OWI, and an order denying his postconviction motion.[1] Luedtke argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14

