Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 64205 for records.

State v. Michael J.K.
an independent evaluation of the historical facts based on the record where there are no findings at all to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15909 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
placement time, which was entered on the record. The financial issue was not resolved and was to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30425 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
or call. Singh made no effort to get Cornelius’ phone records or to challenge the testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86078 - 2012-08-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 635 N.W.2d 797. As such, this court’s review is “limited to the record” and addresses only whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099420 - 2026-04-02

State v. Tammy F.
the State's records at least forty-eight hours before the proceeding. There is simply no comparable civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in circumstances if there is a reasonable basis in the record for the trial court’s decision.” Id., ¶44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28986 - 2007-05-14

CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the amended judgment reflecting Fecht’s modified sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95386 - 2013-04-16

State v. Eugene E. Volk
the prisoner’s status there. We find no support either in the record or the law for Volk’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
Alexander’s additional claims. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, responses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105608 - 2013-12-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 filed a response. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095527 - 2026-03-24