Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18631 - 18640 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 18631 - 18640 of 83454 for case code.
State v. Clyde B. Williams
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3338-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14806 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3338-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14806 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not erroneously exercise its discretion, we must affirm. ¶2 Kadeem and another juvenile cased a vacant home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
not erroneously exercise its discretion, we must affirm. ¶2 Kadeem and another juvenile cased a vacant home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not erroneously exercise its discretion, we must affirm. ¶2 Kadeem and another juvenile cased a vacant home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109783 - 2017-09-21
not erroneously exercise its discretion, we must affirm. ¶2 Kadeem and another juvenile cased a vacant home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109783 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Aiken & Scoptur v. John Brendel
Manlove left Brendel’s firm in November 1998, she took the case with her. Manlove was then employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4314 - 2017-09-19
Manlove left Brendel’s firm in November 1998, she took the case with her. Manlove was then employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4314 - 2017-09-19
Aiken & Scoptur v. John Brendel
, she took the case with her. Manlove was then employed by Attorney Larraine McNamara‑McGraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4314 - 2005-03-31
, she took the case with her. Manlove was then employed by Attorney Larraine McNamara‑McGraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4314 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF440
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901358 - 2025-01-22
summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF440
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901358 - 2025-01-22
State v. Benjay E. Kohanski
. The relevant facts in this case are not in dispute. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kohanski in November 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
. The relevant facts in this case are not in dispute. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kohanski in November 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not have considered an earlier case where he was accused of sexually assaulting his former wife because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15
not have considered an earlier case where he was accused of sexually assaulting his former wife because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. COUNSELL, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2016AP2384 2 ¶1 BLANCHARD, J. 1 This is a refusal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
. COUNSELL, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2016AP2384 2 ¶1 BLANCHARD, J. 1 This is a refusal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98301 - 2014-09-15
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98301 - 2014-09-15