Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1871 - 1880 of 63530 for records.

CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record.[2] We agree with appellate counsel’s conclusion that an appeal would lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100642 - 2013-08-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
faults his attorney for failing to listen to the recordings of the discussion between the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
neither was prosecuted. On appeal, Godard faults his attorney for failing to listen to the recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66224 - 2011-06-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, by postconviction counsel, moved to supplement the record with “any stenographic records or audio recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210691 - 2018-04-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be assessed.” At a March 22, 2023 review hearing, DCFS indicated that without the records it could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701407 - 2023-09-13

[PDF] State v. Victor Groner
%. No. 02-2515-CR 3 that: (1) a police record concerning Julie’s 911 call identified Julie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5684 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
instruction that addresses when a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60902 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to him. Based upon this court’s review of the parties’ arguments and the record, and for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833690 - 2024-08-07

Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment. . Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31

State v. Victor Groner
discovered evidence. That evidence consisted of information that: (1) a police record concerning Julie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5684 - 2005-03-31