Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18741 - 18750 of 98460 for court records search online.
Search results 18741 - 18750 of 98460 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence in the record to uphold the findings of the ALJ, we affirm the order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32722 - 2008-05-19
evidence in the record to uphold the findings of the ALJ, we affirm the order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32722 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to record. The State told the court it had brought an evidence technician to the hearing “to tell the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103799 - 2013-11-04
to record. The State told the court it had brought an evidence technician to the hearing “to tell the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103799 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
Point Police Officer Shulman, informed the court that a video recording of Kohel’s driving, stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15
Point Police Officer Shulman, informed the court that a video recording of Kohel’s driving, stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court identified those portions of the record where the sentencing court considered the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10
court identified those portions of the record where the sentencing court considered the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
because the record had already been transmitted to the court of appeals. Lundt omits part of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30228 - 2007-09-10
because the record had already been transmitted to the court of appeals. Lundt omits part of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30228 - 2007-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
at no cost. The trial court’s findings are supported by the record and we will not disturb them.[5] ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
at no cost. The trial court’s findings are supported by the record and we will not disturb them.[5] ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of that issue is limited to the record before the circuit court in reaching its decision. Morris’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30
of that issue is limited to the record before the circuit court in reaching its decision. Morris’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred when it summarily denied his motion seeking to correct the record. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07
court erred when it summarily denied his motion seeking to correct the record. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Despite the trial court’s specifically stating on the record that it was “stay[ing] any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32736 - 2014-04-14
. ¶5 Despite the trial court’s specifically stating on the record that it was “stay[ing] any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32736 - 2014-04-14