Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18761 - 18770 of 86206 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.
Search results 18761 - 18770 of 86206 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.
Rebecca E. Roethke v. James B. Roethke
, the court concluded that it was not subject to division pursuant to § 767.255(2), Stats.,[1] because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12144 - 2005-03-31
, the court concluded that it was not subject to division pursuant to § 767.255(2), Stats.,[1] because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12144 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to reconsider. He raises numerous issues, none of which provides a basis for relief. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09
to reconsider. He raises numerous issues, none of which provides a basis for relief. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2013AP342-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 551.41(2) and 939.05 (2001-02), 1 and from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105891 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2013AP342-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 551.41(2) and 939.05 (2001-02), 1 and from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Yolanda L.
02-2845 02-2846 2 V. YOLANDA L., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5811 - 2017-09-19
02-2845 02-2846 2 V. YOLANDA L., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5811 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
" as defined No. 94-2484 -2- in § 227.01(13), STATS., and must be promulgated as such. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8117 - 2017-09-19
" as defined No. 94-2484 -2- in § 227.01(13), STATS., and must be promulgated as such. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8117 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Edson
assault Nos. 94-3334-CR 96-0381-CR -2- of a child. See § 948.02(1) & (2).1 Edson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
assault Nos. 94-3334-CR 96-0381-CR -2- of a child. See § 948.02(1) & (2).1 Edson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2015AP2295 2 (2015-16), 1 based on the results of postconviction DNA testing. We affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182809 - 2017-09-21
No. 2015AP2295 2 (2015-16), 1 based on the results of postconviction DNA testing. We affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182809 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nicole A. Fassbender
that the circuit court did not act in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 973.20[2] in a number of ways and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26288 - 2006-08-23
that the circuit court did not act in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 973.20[2] in a number of ways and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26288 - 2006-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain the reasons for the sentence; or (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2014-11-20
; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain the reasons for the sentence; or (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2014-11-20
[PDF]
Burnett County v. AFSCME Local 279-A
"). The union argues that (1) a circuit judge can be a municipal employer under § 111.70(1)(j), STATS.; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
"). The union argues that (1) a circuit judge can be a municipal employer under § 111.70(1)(j), STATS.; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20