Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 82690 for case code.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 82690 for case code.
[PDF]
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
engineering witness, David Rudig, noted that the stairway violated several local building code provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4379 - 2017-09-19
engineering witness, David Rudig, noted that the stairway violated several local building code provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4379 - 2017-09-19
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
Rudig, noted that the stairway violated several local building code provisions, including a stairway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
Rudig, noted that the stairway violated several local building code provisions, including a stairway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
disciplinary decision and declaratory judgment regarding related administrative code provisions. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4948 - 2005-03-31
disciplinary decision and declaratory judgment regarding related administrative code provisions. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
review of a prison disciplinary decision and declaratory judgment regarding related administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4948 - 2017-09-19
review of a prison disciplinary decision and declaratory judgment regarding related administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4948 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. They correctly point out that the expert concluded the stairs did not conform to code and were a cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146338 - 2017-09-21
. They correctly point out that the expert concluded the stairs did not conform to code and were a cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146338 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of Pauli’s expert. They correctly point out that the expert concluded the stairs did not conform to code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146338 - 2015-08-18
of Pauli’s expert. They correctly point out that the expert concluded the stairs did not conform to code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146338 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
Must a judge who formerly was the corporation counsel in charge of the county's child support agency recuse himself or herself in child support cases?
support cases? ANSWER No, except in those cases where the judge served as a lawyer or has
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877 - 2017-09-20
support cases? ANSWER No, except in those cases where the judge served as a lawyer or has
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relies upon our decision in Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech Information Systems, Inc., 229 Wis. 2d 287
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393034 - 2021-07-20
relies upon our decision in Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech Information Systems, Inc., 229 Wis. 2d 287
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393034 - 2021-07-20
State v. Jeffrey L. Oskey
of the judgment. We also affirm the trial court's conclusion that both the state administrative and county code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9271 - 2005-03-31
of the judgment. We also affirm the trial court's conclusion that both the state administrative and county code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Oskey
-2- code sections that prohibit structural repairs and alterations in floodplains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9271 - 2017-09-19
-2- code sections that prohibit structural repairs and alterations in floodplains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9271 - 2017-09-19