Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18841 - 18850 of 98460 for court records search online.

COURT OF APPEALS
court identified those portions of the record where the sentencing court considered the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10

COURT OF APPEALS
because the record had already been transmitted to the court of appeals. Lundt omits part of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30228 - 2007-09-10

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18

COURT OF APPEALS
at no cost. The trial court’s findings are supported by the record and we will not disturb them.[5] ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28

COURT OF APPEALS
of that issue is limited to the record before the circuit court in reaching its decision. Morris’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30

COURT OF APPEALS
court erred when it summarily denied his motion seeking to correct the record. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07

COURT OF APPEALS
the courtroom. The trial court made a record that the sign had been on the door while the victim was testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62520 - 2009-07-13

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Despite the trial court’s specifically stating on the record that it was “stay[ing] any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32736 - 2014-04-14

[PDF] Supreme Court rules petition 10-06
transcribe the variety of audio recordings that are played in court – confessions, 911 calls, undercover
/supreme/docs/1006petition.pdf - 2010-04-15

[PDF] NOTICE
Point Police Officer Shulman, informed the court that a video recording of Kohel’s driving, stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15