Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18851 - 18860 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 18851 - 18860 of 58547 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
the defense. Id. We will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact, “the underlying findings of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23
the defense. Id. We will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact, “the underlying findings of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
and that the wrongly obtained PBT result tainted the subsequent field sobriety tests. He further argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
and that the wrongly obtained PBT result tainted the subsequent field sobriety tests. He further argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and vacating the trial court’s prior order that determined there was probable cause to proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
and vacating the trial court’s prior order that determined there was probable cause to proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to these documents collectively as Luckett’s response. No. 2016AP1747-CRNM 3 Luckett went to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
to these documents collectively as Luckett’s response. No. 2016AP1747-CRNM 3 Luckett went to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
County of Walworth v. William H. Guth
. On April 20, Guth pled not guilty to the charge of violating the zoning code. ¶4 At the bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
. On April 20, Guth pled not guilty to the charge of violating the zoning code. ¶4 At the bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
Fethiye F. Uygur v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.
of persuasion in the first trial than in the second; or (5) are matters of public policy and individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16170 - 2017-09-21
of persuasion in the first trial than in the second; or (5) are matters of public policy and individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16170 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
stepson. Erato also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104188 - 2013-11-12
stepson. Erato also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104188 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
parties moved for summary judgment. ¶4 On February 13, 2007, the trial court granted partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32386 - 2014-09-15
parties moved for summary judgment. ¶4 On February 13, 2007, the trial court granted partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32386 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2012AP2649-CR 2 denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He argues he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
No. 2012AP2649-CR 2 denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He argues he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark J. Zimmerman
)(a). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31
)(a). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31