Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18851 - 18860 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 18851 - 18860 of 58546 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requests a new trial in the interest of justice because the jury was not instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107730 - 2017-09-21
requests a new trial in the interest of justice because the jury was not instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107730 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sean W. Ottman
not have [pled] guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7365 - 2005-03-31
not have [pled] guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7365 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his pleas due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel in relation to a suppression motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30564 - 2007-10-16
his pleas due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel in relation to a suppression motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30564 - 2007-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Sean W. Ottman
] guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7365 - 2017-09-20
] guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7365 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the defense. Id. We will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact, “the underlying findings of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23
the defense. Id. We will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact, “the underlying findings of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
and that the wrongly obtained PBT result tainted the subsequent field sobriety tests. He further argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
and that the wrongly obtained PBT result tainted the subsequent field sobriety tests. He further argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and vacating the trial court’s prior order that determined there was probable cause to proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
and vacating the trial court’s prior order that determined there was probable cause to proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to these documents collectively as Luckett’s response. No. 2016AP1747-CRNM 3 Luckett went to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
to these documents collectively as Luckett’s response. No. 2016AP1747-CRNM 3 Luckett went to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
Michael Zieve v. Jack R. Hayes
granted in favor of Stockholm Mutual Insurance Company. 1 Zieve argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4878 - 2017-09-19
granted in favor of Stockholm Mutual Insurance Company. 1 Zieve argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4878 - 2017-09-19
County of Walworth v. William H. Guth
. On April 20, Guth pled not guilty to the charge of violating the zoning code. ¶4 At the bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
. On April 20, Guth pled not guilty to the charge of violating the zoning code. ¶4 At the bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30