Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 82043 for simple case.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 82043 for simple case.
Sherry Mulligan v. Barbara J. Koehler
appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10417 - 2005-03-31
appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Blodgett
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“fair value” before confirming a sale in cases where the mortgaged premises sell for less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97056 - 2014-09-15
“fair value” before confirming a sale in cases where the mortgaged premises sell for less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97056 - 2014-09-15