Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 62306 for child support.

State v. Rick A. Holtz
of conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a child under age sixteen, as a repeat offender. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17829 - 2005-04-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counts of sexual assault of a child under the age of sixteen, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464306 - 2021-12-21

[PDF] State of the Judiciary Address 2001
-bender case, the child in need of protection and services, the robbery. These cases share the docket
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress01.pdf - 2009-11-19

[PDF] Supreme Court Rules petition 10-08 comment - Legal Action of Wis.
1 Comments of Legal Action of Wisconsin in Support of Rule Petition 10-08 1. Turner v
/supreme/docs/1008commentlawis2.pdf - 2011-09-12

[PDF] State v. Harris D. Byers
. The court concluded that the facts supported the admission and that Byers had entered the admission freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2273 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
those issues were related to Lyon or her child. Scholl took Lyon’s driver’s license and returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=931764 - 2025-03-25

State v. Frederick Harvey
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.20(1)(a), and soliciting a child for prostitution, a felony contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6681 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harris D. Byers
. The court concluded that the facts supported the admission and that Byers had entered the admission freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21

State v. Walter Szymanski
at a health club; (2) whether he made an obscene gesture toward a young child in the victim's family; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9989 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Williams
the statute’s language makes its meaning clear, examples from case law also support our conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10833 - 2005-03-31