Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19051 - 19060 of 29722 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 41
433 (Ct. App. 1990), of which our review is de novo. The tenants also challenge the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to those findings of fact is reviewed de novo. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252085 - 2020-01-07

[PDF] State v. Dominic D. Robinson
a search or seizure passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12480 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jean Stewart v. The Douglas Stewart Company, Inc.
of limitations. Stewart appeals. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6394 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this prima facie showing is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oneida Cty. DSS v. Therese S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218074 - 2018-08-28

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Jones v. Jenkins, 88 Wis. 2d 712, 722, 277 N.W.2d 815 (1979). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81038 - 2012-04-16

State v. Paul F. Wischer
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. If we conclude on a threshold basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6657 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Estate of Sustache v. American Family Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136997 - 2015-03-09

State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
is a legal determination this court reviews de novo.” State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12