Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19141 - 19150 of 29828 for des.
Search results 19141 - 19150 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Carlson’s revocation decision. After reviewing the evidence de novo, DHA concluded that DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
Carlson’s revocation decision. After reviewing the evidence de novo, DHA concluded that DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
On our de novo review of the trial court’s legal analysis, and giving its implicit findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59513 - 2014-09-15
On our de novo review of the trial court’s legal analysis, and giving its implicit findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59513 - 2014-09-15
WI App 45 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP31 Complete Title of C...
that is “very nearly” one of first impression will receive “due weight” deference. Id. Finally, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94555 - 2013-11-17
that is “very nearly” one of first impression will receive “due weight” deference. Id. Finally, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94555 - 2013-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
Paul S. Gantner v. Diane Jo Gantner
shown at trial amounted to only $255. Any effect of this disputed fact is de minimis. [4] We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3809 - 2005-03-31
shown at trial amounted to only $255. Any effect of this disputed fact is de minimis. [4] We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
that performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21
that performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jamie M. Grosse
double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thierfelder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11116 - 2017-09-19
double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thierfelder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711920 - 2023-10-11
conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711920 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19