Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19221 - 19230 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19221 - 19230 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Village of Westfield v. Thomas A. Moore
that his double jeopardy claim fails under State v. McMaster, 198 Wis.2d 542, 543 N.W.2d 499 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9941 - 2005-03-31
that his double jeopardy claim fails under State v. McMaster, 198 Wis.2d 542, 543 N.W.2d 499 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9941 - 2005-03-31
State v. Melvin Caballero
an order denying his post-conviction motion. Caballero claims: (1) that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9337 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his post-conviction motion. Caballero claims: (1) that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9337 - 2005-03-31
State v. Billye L. Massey
counsel’s claimed ineffectiveness. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
counsel’s claimed ineffectiveness. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
Program. The claims are barred. ¶7 A defendant may challenge his or her sentence as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33246 - 2008-06-30
Program. The claims are barred. ¶7 A defendant may challenge his or her sentence as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33246 - 2008-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Daniel M. Bucheger
on inherently incredible and contradictory evidence. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13717 - 2014-09-15
on inherently incredible and contradictory evidence. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judge was bound by the plea agreement. ¶7 In denying relief on this claim, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76597 - 2014-09-15
the judge was bound by the plea agreement. ¶7 In denying relief on this claim, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76597 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
various circuit court errors.[4] However, Michael did not include in his reconsideration motion his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88878 - 2012-11-06
various circuit court errors.[4] However, Michael did not include in his reconsideration motion his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88878 - 2012-11-06
State v. Claude Lowery
to a secured facility for treatment. Lowery claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2005-03-31
to a secured facility for treatment. Lowery claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
summarily affirm on the basis that Estrada’s claims are procedurally barred under State v. Escalona
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94476 - 2014-09-15
summarily affirm on the basis that Estrada’s claims are procedurally barred under State v. Escalona
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94476 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard T. Wittrock
a pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion to withdraw his no contest plea to the burglary charge claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21
a pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion to withdraw his no contest plea to the burglary charge claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21