Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19231 - 19240 of 61137 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 19231 - 19240 of 61137 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Eugene Nichols
after an altercation with his cellmate, Ronald Rode. Nichols claimed he acted in self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
after an altercation with his cellmate, Ronald Rode. Nichols claimed he acted in self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl P. Fike
right to a trial by jury. We conclude that this is a claim of instructional error. While State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
right to a trial by jury. We conclude that this is a claim of instructional error. While State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP15-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF1143
to the circuit court for a hearing on Wesley’s claim. Id., ¶24. This appeal is taken from the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60996 - 2014-09-15
to the circuit court for a hearing on Wesley’s claim. Id., ¶24. This appeal is taken from the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60996 - 2014-09-15
State v. Keith D. Heacox
. Finally, we reject Heacox’s claim under issue four because it is controlled by our decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3988 - 2005-03-31
. Finally, we reject Heacox’s claim under issue four because it is controlled by our decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3988 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the restitution imposed at sentencing. Because Flores does not demonstrate a basis for pursuing his claim, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73605 - 2011-11-14
for the restitution imposed at sentencing. Because Flores does not demonstrate a basis for pursuing his claim, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73605 - 2011-11-14
State v. David A. Gayhart
and claimed that he had entered the pleas because he was not ready to go to trial due to the alcohol he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15573 - 2005-03-31
and claimed that he had entered the pleas because he was not ready to go to trial due to the alcohol he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15573 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intelligently entered, claiming that he did not “understand the implications of giving up his constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
intelligently entered, claiming that he did not “understand the implications of giving up his constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
Charles R. Lutz v. Washburn County
basis for claiming a prescriptive easement; and (2) the Lutzs failed to establish the prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13471 - 2017-09-21
basis for claiming a prescriptive easement; and (2) the Lutzs failed to establish the prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13471 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter D. Wicker
for postconviction relief. Wicker claims that his trial lawyer gave him ineffective representation. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
for postconviction relief. Wicker claims that his trial lawyer gave him ineffective representation. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
[PDF]
Leon Coleman v. Dan Buchler
that Coleman aided and abetted the possession of intoxicants. He claims his right to due process was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9167 - 2017-09-19
that Coleman aided and abetted the possession of intoxicants. He claims his right to due process was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9167 - 2017-09-19