Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19271 - 19280 of 29832 for des.
Search results 19271 - 19280 of 29832 for des.
WI App 59 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP827-CR Complete Title ...
, but we review de novo the ultimate legal question of whether under the circumstances the suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94722 - 2013-05-28
, but we review de novo the ultimate legal question of whether under the circumstances the suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94722 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191100 - 2017-09-21
. The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191100 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roland F. Sarko v. Examining Board of Architects
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3892 - 2017-09-20
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3892 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Robin West v. Department of Commerce
(Ct. App. 1996). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14144 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1996). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14144 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John Doe 67C v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
appeal is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6525 - 2017-09-19
appeal is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6525 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI 33
. Stat. § 808.03(1). This presents a question of law, which is reviewed de novo. Harder v. Pfitzinger
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28525 - 2007-03-20
. Stat. § 808.03(1). This presents a question of law, which is reviewed de novo. Harder v. Pfitzinger
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28525 - 2007-03-20
Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
omitted). Our review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31
omitted). Our review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. See State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d 844
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218007 - 2018-08-17
that we review de novo. See State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d 844
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218007 - 2018-08-17
[PDF]
Nekoosa Papers, Inc. v. Magnum Timber Corporation
on the pleadings should be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Freedom from Religion Found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2848 - 2017-09-19
on the pleadings should be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Freedom from Religion Found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2848 - 2017-09-19
State v. John F. Braz
review the ultimate determination of whether counsel was ineffective de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2689 - 2005-03-31
review the ultimate determination of whether counsel was ineffective de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2689 - 2005-03-31