Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19321 - 19330 of 98453 for court records search online.
Search results 19321 - 19330 of 98453 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the sentencing court. Id. We do, however, scrutinize the record to ensure that the court in fact exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94978 - 2015-08-30
of the sentencing court. Id. We do, however, scrutinize the record to ensure that the court in fact exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94978 - 2015-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for deliberations at 3:11 p.m.” The court asked if there was anything else for the record, and the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66431 - 2011-06-22
for deliberations at 3:11 p.m.” The court asked if there was anything else for the record, and the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66431 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45542 - 2010-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45542 - 2010-01-11
[PDF]
State v. John Casteel
raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine whether that was in fact the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3170 - 2017-09-19
raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine whether that was in fact the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3170 - 2017-09-19
State v. John Casteel
that an issue had not been previously raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3171 - 2005-03-31
that an issue had not been previously raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3171 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Casteel
that an issue had not been previously raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
that an issue had not been previously raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Casteel
raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine whether that was in fact the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3171 - 2017-09-19
raised, the trial court would have to review the record to determine whether that was in fact the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3171 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lori B. v. Steven B.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE January 20, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE January 20, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21
Leon I. Metz v. Prism Corp.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED June 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9343 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED June 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Leon I. Metz v. Prism Corp.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED June 27, 1996 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9343 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED June 27, 1996 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9343 - 2017-09-19