Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 69801 for he.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 69801 for he.
[PDF]
James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
conviction for reckless homicide was not conclusive for the purposes of § 852.01(2m), STATS., and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19
conviction for reckless homicide was not conclusive for the purposes of § 852.01(2m), STATS., and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
convictions, when in fact he had nine convictions. Tiepelman does not dispute his underlying conduct; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18978 - 2005-08-30
convictions, when in fact he had nine convictions. Tiepelman does not dispute his underlying conduct; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18978 - 2005-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
-10).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75291 - 2011-12-19
-10).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75291 - 2011-12-19
James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
of § 852.01(2m), Stats., and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to § 852.01(2m)(br). Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9972 - 2005-03-31
of § 852.01(2m), Stats., and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to § 852.01(2m)(br). Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Minko Lewis
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
testified to the following. At approximately 12:05 a.m., on January 18, 2009, he was traveling southbound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54183 - 2010-09-07
testified to the following. At approximately 12:05 a.m., on January 18, 2009, he was traveling southbound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54183 - 2010-09-07
State v. Aniton G. Thomas
appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6799 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6799 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the range of punishments he faced, the constitutional rights he waived by entering a plea, and the direct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699514 - 2023-09-06
and the range of punishments he faced, the constitutional rights he waived by entering a plea, and the direct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699514 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Aniton G. Thomas
from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. He claims evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6799 - 2017-09-20
from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. He claims evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6799 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that Stanley Fredericks was not competent and was subject to Michael’s undue influence when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36261 - 2009-04-22
that Stanley Fredericks was not competent and was subject to Michael’s undue influence when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36261 - 2009-04-22