Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19521 - 19530 of 68530 for did.
Search results 19521 - 19530 of 68530 for did.
State v. Raymond F. Molitor
to withdraw his no contest plea because he did not understand the charge against him, and thus the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11436 - 2005-03-31
to withdraw his no contest plea because he did not understand the charge against him, and thus the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Oshkosh v. Steven J. Winkler
the City did not waive its right to raise certain arguments challenging this ruling even though it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10639 - 2017-09-20
the City did not waive its right to raise certain arguments challenging this ruling even though it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10639 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the 2005-06 lease period, Steffen Brother’s told D & D it did not intend to enter further leases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32726 - 2008-05-20
of the 2005-06 lease period, Steffen Brother’s told D & D it did not intend to enter further leases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32726 - 2008-05-20
Kurt A. Gorman v. John P. Dahlberg
to Gorman’s complaint. We conclude the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in accepting the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7493 - 2005-03-31
to Gorman’s complaint. We conclude the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in accepting the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stan Smith, Inc. v. Robert Fransway
addressed the quantum meruit claim and, further, did so in a way that assumed that the quantum meruit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10435 - 2017-09-20
addressed the quantum meruit claim and, further, did so in a way that assumed that the quantum meruit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10435 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Frank
that the law did not require Frank to enter into a Wallerman stipulation. Rather, Frank had a choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21
that the law did not require Frank to enter into a Wallerman stipulation. Rather, Frank had a choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
conclude that Swenson’s warrantless entry did not violate Hampton’s Fourth Amendment rights because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
conclude that Swenson’s warrantless entry did not violate Hampton’s Fourth Amendment rights because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
noted that Loga-Negru did not qualify for State Public Defender representation No. 2019AP1023-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390695 - 2021-07-14
noted that Loga-Negru did not qualify for State Public Defender representation No. 2019AP1023-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390695 - 2021-07-14
2009 WI APP 148
the court did not give enough weight to the DOC recommendation. We reject both of Washington’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40411 - 2009-10-27
the court did not give enough weight to the DOC recommendation. We reject both of Washington’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40411 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a continuance of the prompt disposition period. The State did not, however, assert any reason for its delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640502 - 2023-04-04
a continuance of the prompt disposition period. The State did not, however, assert any reason for its delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640502 - 2023-04-04