Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
The State alleged that Socha had at least eleven prior OWI-related offenses. Prior to trial, Socha moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132818 - 2015-01-12
The State alleged that Socha had at least eleven prior OWI-related offenses. Prior to trial, Socha moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132818 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
State v. Jason W. Wright
is not the sole remedy allowed. We affirm the trial court. Wright first submits that statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8269 - 2017-09-19
is not the sole remedy allowed. We affirm the trial court. Wright first submits that statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8269 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kimberly D. Erkkila-Miller v. James E. Stoll, M.D.
Stoll.1 Stoll argues: (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13110 - 2017-09-21
Stoll.1 Stoll argues: (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13110 - 2017-09-21
Kimberly D. Erkkila-Miller v. James E. Stoll, M.D.
.[1] Stoll argues: (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury; and (2) that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13110 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Stoll argues: (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury; and (2) that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13110 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
the statements he made to police. After a hearing, the trial court ruled that, while the Edwards violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
the statements he made to police. After a hearing, the trial court ruled that, while the Edwards violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
State v. George W. Perkins
on both counts constitutes double jeopardy. He also seeks remand for resentencing, contending the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16057 - 2005-03-31
on both counts constitutes double jeopardy. He also seeks remand for resentencing, contending the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16057 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 204
Weber (collectively “Darlington”). Olson contends the trial court erred by compelling disclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26538 - 2006-10-30
Weber (collectively “Darlington”). Olson contends the trial court erred by compelling disclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26538 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel. See State v. Pegeese, 2019 WI 60, ¶¶37-38, 387 Wis. 2d 119, 928 N.W.2d 590
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643529 - 2023-04-11
trial counsel. See State v. Pegeese, 2019 WI 60, ¶¶37-38, 387 Wis. 2d 119, 928 N.W.2d 590
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643529 - 2023-04-11
Robin C. Acker v. Lawrence P. Sullivan, M.D.
(collectively “Sullivan”) appeal from a judgment, following a jury trial, awarding Robin C. Acker, her husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2005-03-31
(collectively “Sullivan”) appeal from a judgment, following a jury trial, awarding Robin C. Acker, her husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions on two counts of misdemeanor bail jumping. He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22
convictions on two counts of misdemeanor bail jumping. He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22