Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 58510 for speedy trial.

Robin C. Acker v. Lawrence P. Sullivan, M.D.
(collectively “Sullivan”) appeal from a judgment, following a jury trial, awarding Robin C. Acker, her husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] William Fifer, Sr. v. Lyle A. Dix
from Dix’s negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to Dix, concluding that Dix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15704 - 2017-09-21

Ronald D. Tym v. Helen M. Ludwig
was depressed and the Tyms had to sell their home for less. The trial court granted judgment to the lawyers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8219 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
owns the Morgan Avenue property.1 ¶2 Hummingbird argues that the trial court erred as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259967 - 2020-05-12

State v. Alfonso Dennis
to § 946.12(2), Stats. He claims: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12795 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Miriam T. v. Church Mutual Insurance Company
. Miriam T., Jared T., Jr., and Johnny T. (collectively, “the appellants”) appeal from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10337 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jason W. Wright
is not the sole remedy allowed. We affirm the trial court. Wright first submits that statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8269 - 2017-09-19

Doris Hanson v. Kelly M. Sangermano
, Sangermano’s insurer. The Hansons argue that the trial court erred by denying their motion for preverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10914 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
cross-appeals from trial-court orders modifying physical placement and child support, and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4370 - 2017-09-19

Bank One Wisconsin v. Robert H. Kahl
the believed amount of equity. Eighteen months later, Bank One moved to vacate the judgment and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 - 2005-03-31