Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19631 - 19640 of 98424 for court records search online.
Search results 19631 - 19640 of 98424 for court records search online.
State v. Terrence L. Webb
of the appellate record. The State notes, however, that the sentencing court “specifically recited the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
of the appellate record. The State notes, however, that the sentencing court “specifically recited the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leroy A. Yench
829 (1980). We will search the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
829 (1980). We will search the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leroy A. Yench
829 (1980). We will search the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
829 (1980). We will search the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶10 Based upon the record, we conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56782 - 2010-11-16
). ¶10 Based upon the record, we conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56782 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to conduct colloquies when defendants decide to testify, the court conducted an on-the-record colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96841 - 2013-05-15
to conduct colloquies when defendants decide to testify, the court conducted an on-the-record colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96841 - 2013-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
place in the record where they made this joinder argument before the circuit court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135365 - 2015-02-18
place in the record where they made this joinder argument before the circuit court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135365 - 2015-02-18
[PDF]
State v. Gordon Dain
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE May 19, 1999 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13809 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE May 19, 1999 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13809 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gordon Dain
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE May 19, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13809 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE May 19, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
the bias claim in the circuit court. We do not search the record to support a litigant’s arguments, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390736 - 2021-07-14
the bias claim in the circuit court. We do not search the record to support a litigant’s arguments, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390736 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
Daniel Substad v. Frances Thorson
of the parties, and that Substad did not raise his procedural objection before the trial court. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13105 - 2017-09-21
of the parties, and that Substad did not raise his procedural objection before the trial court. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13105 - 2017-09-21