Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1971 - 1980 of 9854 for WA 08.
Search results 1971 - 1980 of 9854 for WA 08.
COURT OF APPEALS
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36570 - 2009-05-26
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36570 - 2009-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
(PAC) of .08 or more, second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
(PAC) of .08 or more, second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
reason for failing to previously raise these issues. See Wis. Stat. § 974.06(4) (2007-08);[3] Tillman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52533 - 2010-07-26
reason for failing to previously raise these issues. See Wis. Stat. § 974.06(4) (2007-08);[3] Tillman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52533 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
fact findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40021 - 2014-09-15
fact findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40021 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for reconsideration. Garner argues: (1) that the University violated WIS. STAT. § 103.13 (2007-08)1 by denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
for reconsideration. Garner argues: (1) that the University violated WIS. STAT. § 103.13 (2007-08)1 by denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. See id. at 31; see Wis. Stat. § 767.56 (2007-08).[1] Some of those factors relate to the support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36882 - 2009-06-24
. See id. at 31; see Wis. Stat. § 767.56 (2007-08).[1] Some of those factors relate to the support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36882 - 2009-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36065 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2007-08).2 In that motion, Parker alleged for the first time that the prosecutor violated Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49298 - 2014-09-15
(2007-08).2 In that motion, Parker alleged for the first time that the prosecutor violated Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2007-08) motion was entered in June 2009. All subsequent references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
(2007-08) motion was entered in June 2009. All subsequent references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08), it would also fail. Section 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41537 - 2009-09-28
postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08), it would also fail. Section 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41537 - 2009-09-28