Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 30243 for de.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 30243 for de.
State v. Kenneth W. Pickens
, the ultimate question of whether Pickens' trial counsel was ineffective is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31
, the ultimate question of whether Pickens' trial counsel was ineffective is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John C. Thorstad
that we review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992). The use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15717 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992). The use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15717 - 2017-09-21
WI App 51 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1457-CR Complete Title...
present questions of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110662 - 2014-05-27
present questions of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110662 - 2014-05-27
State v. Jessie Redmond
which this court reviews de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7917 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33. For the same reasons we have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
review de novo. See Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33. For the same reasons we have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether an error was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Domke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526997 - 2022-06-01
and whether an error was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Domke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526997 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
John Doe 67A v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
appeal is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6526 - 2017-09-19
appeal is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6526 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Plude, 2008 WI 58, ¶33, 310 Wis. 2d at 49, 750 N.W.2d at 53. We consider questions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22
of law. Plude, 2008 WI 58, ¶33, 310 Wis. 2d at 49, 750 N.W.2d at 53. We consider questions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22
Duane v. Town of Menasha
affirmed the Appeals Board’s decision, we examine the record de novo without deference to the opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10151 - 2005-03-31
affirmed the Appeals Board’s decision, we examine the record de novo without deference to the opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10151 - 2005-03-31