Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 58970 for quit claim deed.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 58970 for quit claim deed.
State v. James Jagodinsky
a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
State v. George L. Jones
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for summary judgment dismissing Bushard’s claim that Reisman was not entitled to take a salary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14
moved for summary judgment dismissing Bushard’s claim that Reisman was not entitled to take a salary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14
[PDF]
Ann M. Zutz v. Gregory S. Zutz
Gregory's claim that under § 767.32(1)(b)2 and (2), STATS., the passing No. 96-1136 -4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10714 - 2017-09-20
Gregory's claim that under § 767.32(1)(b)2 and (2), STATS., the passing No. 96-1136 -4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10714 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
State v. Donald Kaltenbach
, claiming that counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he requested resentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3020 - 2005-03-31
, claiming that counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he requested resentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3020 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
). A reviewing court may dispose of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on either ground. Id. at 697
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
). A reviewing court may dispose of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on either ground. Id. at 697
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Bardwell claims he is entitled to a new trial based upon ineffective assistance of counsel because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
. Bardwell claims he is entitled to a new trial based upon ineffective assistance of counsel because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of felony bail jumping, and an order denying postconviction relief. He claims: (1) his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
of felony bail jumping, and an order denying postconviction relief. He claims: (1) his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). Specifically, he claims his right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). Specifically, he claims his right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19