Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19741 - 19750 of 38093 for d's.
Search results 19741 - 19750 of 38093 for d's.
State v. Matthew E. Haas
. On March 8, 2003, at approximately 2:10 a.m., City of Racine Police Officer D. Rybarik was on routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19944 - 2005-10-18
. On March 8, 2003, at approximately 2:10 a.m., City of Racine Police Officer D. Rybarik was on routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19944 - 2005-10-18
Frontsheet
plea withdrawal. Rather, the State argued that Lopez merely "desire[d] to have a trial," which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108881 - 2014-03-06
plea withdrawal. Rather, the State argued that Lopez merely "desire[d] to have a trial," which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108881 - 2014-03-06
[PDF]
Response Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Lisa Hunter et al.)
-6200 JDevaney@perkinscoie.com Christina A. Ford* William K. Hancock* Jacob D. Shelly* ELIAS LAW
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefhunter2.pdf - 2022-01-03
-6200 JDevaney@perkinscoie.com Christina A. Ford* William K. Hancock* Jacob D. Shelly* ELIAS LAW
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefhunter2.pdf - 2022-01-03
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - December 2020
without oral argument: 18AP1832-D Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James C. Ritland Note
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsdec2020.pdf - 2020-12-15
without oral argument: 18AP1832-D Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James C. Ritland Note
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsdec2020.pdf - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2020
without oral argument: 18AP1832-D Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James C. Ritland Note
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311859 - 2020-12-15
without oral argument: 18AP1832-D Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James C. Ritland Note
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311859 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
Madison Teachers Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School District
of Kirk D. Strang and Alan G.B. Kim, Jr., Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Madison. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6172 - 2017-09-19
of Kirk D. Strang and Alan G.B. Kim, Jr., Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Madison. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6172 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the officer “observe[d] a number of clues indicating that [Solheim] was impaired,” confirming the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850895 - 2024-09-18
, the officer “observe[d] a number of clues indicating that [Solheim] was impaired,” confirming the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850895 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
) renumbered § DHS 83.32(3)(d) effective April 1, 2009. To the extent that it argues that the alleged code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44493 - 2014-09-15
) renumbered § DHS 83.32(3)(d) effective April 1, 2009. To the extent that it argues that the alleged code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44493 - 2014-09-15
ECO, Inc v. City of Elkhorn
, there was a brief by John M. Murphy of Leece & Phillips, S.C., Elkhorn. There were oral arguments by Ward D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4868 - 2005-03-31
, there was a brief by John M. Murphy of Leece & Phillips, S.C., Elkhorn. There were oral arguments by Ward D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4868 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI App 218
. In Anderson v. State, 66 Wis. 2d 233, 248, 223 N.W.2d 879 (1974), the court explained that “[d]emonstrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30160 - 2007-10-30
. In Anderson v. State, 66 Wis. 2d 233, 248, 223 N.W.2d 879 (1974), the court explained that “[d]emonstrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30160 - 2007-10-30