Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 39815 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 39815 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
State v. Wallace J. Hammerle
statements about the death, and testified that he never discussed the matter with Estep. ¶6 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6230 - 2017-09-19
statements about the death, and testified that he never discussed the matter with Estep. ¶6 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6230 - 2017-09-19
State v. Derrick L Waller
was ineffective for not objecting to several statements about a defense witness made by one of the police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10412 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective for not objecting to several statements about a defense witness made by one of the police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10412 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did have a hearing disability. Their statements were based on a subjective hearing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
did have a hearing disability. Their statements were based on a subjective hearing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
CA Blank Order
with the couple’s inconsistent statements, led the investigator to suspect a domestic violence incident. The victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106520 - 2014-01-06
with the couple’s inconsistent statements, led the investigator to suspect a domestic violence incident. The victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106520 - 2014-01-06
State v. Brian W. Easton
conclude that Easton was not subjected to a custodial interrogation at the time he made the statements he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3102 - 2005-03-31
conclude that Easton was not subjected to a custodial interrogation at the time he made the statements he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on an improper factor when sentencing him. He emphasized the court’s statement during sentencing: “[T]here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26
on an improper factor when sentencing him. He emphasized the court’s statement during sentencing: “[T]here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
Robert M. Weidenbaum v.
the following February. That statement was contrary to one he had given to police officers investigating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16998 - 2017-09-21
the following February. That statement was contrary to one he had given to police officers investigating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16998 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
493 (Ct. App. 1979). ¶11 Schwister’s argument is also contrary to the statement of purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2007-02-26
493 (Ct. App. 1979). ¶11 Schwister’s argument is also contrary to the statement of purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2007-02-26
State v. Kevin D. Russo
judge and, with a racial slur, to kill the prosecutor. Russo contends the statement is hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26058 - 2006-08-01
judge and, with a racial slur, to kill the prosecutor. Russo contends the statement is hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26058 - 2006-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
statement by Chase or a client that Striepling “was not authorized to accept service on Chase’s behalf.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32180 - 2008-03-24
statement by Chase or a client that Striepling “was not authorized to accept service on Chase’s behalf.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32180 - 2008-03-24