Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19861 - 19870 of 69794 for he.
Search results 19861 - 19870 of 69794 for he.
State v. Michael D. Thompson
that he had not validly waived his right to counsel in that case. We agree, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7326 - 2005-03-31
that he had not validly waived his right to counsel in that case. We agree, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward A. Bogart
that he had failed to rebut the presumption that he is the children's father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9439 - 2005-03-31
that he had failed to rebut the presumption that he is the children's father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Alan Williams
motion to modify his sentence. He argues that the circuit court erred when it concluded that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18076 - 2017-09-21
motion to modify his sentence. He argues that the circuit court erred when it concluded that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18076 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Devaldis A. Garth
and parked thirty feet south of Garth, he began walking to the north. Officer Weiss left the place from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3028 - 2017-09-19
and parked thirty feet south of Garth, he began walking to the north. Officer Weiss left the place from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3028 - 2017-09-19
Town of La Prairie v. Mule Hill Materials & Nursery, Inc.
and William Kennedy and on photographs submitted by the parties. ¶5 Gordon Hill averred that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
and William Kennedy and on photographs submitted by the parties. ¶5 Gordon Hill averred that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
that No. 2008AP1044 2 he is raising after the conclusion of his direct appeal. We conclude that Edwards’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47253 - 2014-09-15
that No. 2008AP1044 2 he is raising after the conclusion of his direct appeal. We conclude that Edwards’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47253 - 2014-09-15
Strasser & Yde v. Joel Larson
on his own behalf at a court trial on both cases. Larson informed the court that he had no complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2682 - 2005-03-31
on his own behalf at a court trial on both cases. Larson informed the court that he had no complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2682 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
(1967). Radencich was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
(1967). Radencich was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
conclusory and did not constitute new factors (“Alexander II”). ¶5 Nine months after he filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28150 - 2007-02-20
conclusory and did not constitute new factors (“Alexander II”). ¶5 Nine months after he filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28150 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. He was given zero days’ sentence credit but contends he should have been awarded 740 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210124 - 2018-03-28
of conviction. He was given zero days’ sentence credit but contends he should have been awarded 740 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210124 - 2018-03-28