Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 68502 for did.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and affirm. ¶2 In 1990, a paternity judgment was entered against Dye when he did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30738 - 2007-11-05
, and affirm. ¶2 In 1990, a paternity judgment was entered against Dye when he did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30738 - 2007-11-05
State v. Michael Mageland
to dismiss the charge on the grounds that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop Mageland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14537 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss the charge on the grounds that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop Mageland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14537 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jane L. Auel
was largely inaudible, but did confirm Auel's statement that more than thirty of the plants were hers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8504 - 2017-09-19
was largely inaudible, but did confirm Auel's statement that more than thirty of the plants were hers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8504 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
challenges the judgment of foreclosure because the circuit court did not have personal jurisdiction over
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99570 - 2014-09-15
challenges the judgment of foreclosure because the circuit court did not have personal jurisdiction over
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99570 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald L. Mikkelson
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied the motion. We conclude the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14840 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied the motion. We conclude the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
though Hill did not request such an appointment. We reject the argument for two reasons. First
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171403 - 2017-09-21
though Hill did not request such an appointment. We reject the argument for two reasons. First
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171403 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lester H. Cook
not claim that the trial court did not comply with the mandatory procedures for accepting a guilty plea
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10223 - 2017-09-20
not claim that the trial court did not comply with the mandatory procedures for accepting a guilty plea
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10223 - 2017-09-20
State v. James E. Jones
as a prerequisite to his appeal. State v. Meyer, 150 Wis.2d 603, 604, 442 N.W.2d 483, 484 (Ct. App. 1989). He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11205 - 2005-03-31
as a prerequisite to his appeal. State v. Meyer, 150 Wis.2d 603, 604, 442 N.W.2d 483, 484 (Ct. App. 1989). He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia A. Barnes v. Walker B. Johnson
that Johnson did not challenge the underlying order within a reasonable period of time, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7047 - 2017-09-20
that Johnson did not challenge the underlying order within a reasonable period of time, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7047 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
against Dye when he did not appear for the hearing. In 2006, he brought a motion to have genetic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30738 - 2014-09-15
against Dye when he did not appear for the hearing. In 2006, he brought a motion to have genetic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30738 - 2014-09-15