Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19891 - 19900 of 70174 for his.
Search results 19891 - 19900 of 70174 for his.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125544 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered in favor of his former girlfriend, Brenda.1 He also appeals an order denying his WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14
entered in favor of his former girlfriend, Brenda.1 He also appeals an order denying his WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14
WI App 19 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1487 Complete Title of...
Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 STARK, J. Stuart S. appeals an order dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133315 - 2015-02-24
Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 STARK, J. Stuart S. appeals an order dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133315 - 2015-02-24
State v. Marvin L. Hereford
an order denying his motion for a new trial. Hereford was convicted after a retrial following a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7922 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for a new trial. Hereford was convicted after a retrial following a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7922 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward F. Topping
and the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He makes these claims on appeal: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
and the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He makes these claims on appeal: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 131
)(e). He makes two contentions on appeal. First, he asserts his constitutional right to a unanimous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33501 - 2011-06-14
)(e). He makes two contentions on appeal. First, he asserts his constitutional right to a unanimous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33501 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §§ 940.05(1), 939.32 & 939.63(1)(b). He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03
. Stat. §§ 940.05(1), 939.32 & 939.63(1)(b). He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03
[PDF]
Certification
before taking his or her plea establishes a prima facie showing that the defendant’s plea was unknowing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177817 - 2017-09-21
before taking his or her plea establishes a prima facie showing that the defendant’s plea was unknowing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177817 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, Daniel E. Shovers, by his Guardian ad Litem, Kevin J. Demet, Co-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39951 - 2005-03-31
, Daniel E. Shovers, by his Guardian ad Litem, Kevin J. Demet, Co-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39951 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 19
and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 STARK, J. Stuart S. appeals an order dismissing his paternity action against Heidi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133315 - 2017-09-21
and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 STARK, J. Stuart S. appeals an order dismissing his paternity action against Heidi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133315 - 2017-09-21