Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19961 - 19970 of 98424 for court records search online.
Search results 19961 - 19970 of 98424 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
). The sentencing record must show the basis for the circuit court’s exercise of discretion. See McCleary v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72590 - 2011-10-24
). The sentencing record must show the basis for the circuit court’s exercise of discretion. See McCleary v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72590 - 2011-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
methodology). “We do value any analysis that the trial court has placed in the record.” Motive Equip., 291
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
methodology). “We do value any analysis that the trial court has placed in the record.” Motive Equip., 291
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“[A]n appellate court can only review matters of record in the trial court and cannot consider new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35245 - 2009-01-20
) (“[A]n appellate court can only review matters of record in the trial court and cannot consider new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35245 - 2009-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record supporting that conclusion, we affirm the trial court’s exercise of discretion. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
in the record supporting that conclusion, we affirm the trial court’s exercise of discretion. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 14, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 14, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record to support this finding. We disagree. The court’s finding was reasonable based on the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94299 - 2013-03-18
in the record to support this finding. We disagree. The court’s finding was reasonable based on the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94299 - 2013-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84631 - 2012-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84631 - 2012-07-09