Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Mareese Anderson
treatment needed to be tested in a confined setting. We conclude that the factual findings were fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
treatment needed to be tested in a confined setting. We conclude that the factual findings were fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W. Marola
the two-pronged test of New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985), the search was unreasonable. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13433 - 2017-09-21
the two-pronged test of New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985), the search was unreasonable. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13433 - 2017-09-21
James Merkel v. Village of Germantown
following the recalculation. Because certiorari exists for a limited purpose—to test the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13273 - 2005-03-31
following the recalculation. Because certiorari exists for a limited purpose—to test the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to random blood alcohol testing, and he was not to drive a vehicle without a valid driver's license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109586 - 2017-09-21
to random blood alcohol testing, and he was not to drive a vehicle without a valid driver's license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109586 - 2017-09-21
State v. James H. Lindvig
of a high probability of death or great bodily harm as measured by the objective reasonable person test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
of a high probability of death or great bodily harm as measured by the objective reasonable person test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
-CR; 97-1329-CR & 97-1330-CR 6 evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12449 - 2017-09-21
-CR; 97-1329-CR & 97-1330-CR 6 evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12449 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that gunpowder residue testing was performed on the swabs. Thus, there is nothing to indicate such evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106336 - 2014-01-06
that gunpowder residue testing was performed on the swabs. Thus, there is nothing to indicate such evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106336 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The harmless error test applies to claims that the circuit court erroneously admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165554 - 2017-09-21
. The harmless error test applies to claims that the circuit court erroneously admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jon P. Cantwell
). The first component of the test is whether each offense requires proof of an additional element or fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11410 - 2017-09-19
). The first component of the test is whether each offense requires proof of an additional element or fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
issue, we employ a two-pronged test. See id. The first prong requires that we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10225 - 2017-09-20
issue, we employ a two-pronged test. See id. The first prong requires that we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10225 - 2017-09-20