Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20081 - 20090 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 20081 - 20090 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed in his first Machner hearing. He claimed trial counsel failed to: pursue exculpatory footprint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34566 - 2008-11-11
discussed in his first Machner hearing. He claimed trial counsel failed to: pursue exculpatory footprint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34566 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and incomplete. We conclude that Allen’s claim that denial of her motion in limine was error is too inadequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
and incomplete. We conclude that Allen’s claim that denial of her motion in limine was error is too inadequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. ¶8 Without taking evidence, the circuit court denied both Williams’ claim regarding the DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
hearing. ¶8 Without taking evidence, the circuit court denied both Williams’ claim regarding the DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the State breached the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009659 - 2025-09-17
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the State breached the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009659 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2008AP1481 2 (2007-08).1 Because Warren’s claims are either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2008AP1481 2 (2007-08).1 Because Warren’s claims are either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Vernon H. Walker
, but that our previous decisions bar the remainder of Walker’s claims. 2 We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
, but that our previous decisions bar the remainder of Walker’s claims. 2 We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the ground that Jones’s claim was barred by State v. Escalona- Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
on the ground that Jones’s claim was barred by State v. Escalona- Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
Andrea Arenas v. Chad Matthews
and Abrams. In her claim against Abrams, Arenas claimed that Abrams should have foreseen Matthews’ assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11080 - 2005-03-31
and Abrams. In her claim against Abrams, Arenas claimed that Abrams should have foreseen Matthews’ assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11080 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lee A. Brown
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Brown claims that: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Brown claims that: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Specifically, Tiggs claimed his original sentence structure was an “unconstitutional application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105642 - 2017-09-21
.” Specifically, Tiggs claimed his original sentence structure was an “unconstitutional application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105642 - 2017-09-21