Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 83793 for simple case search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 83793 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Andrews, Jr.
. Although the case did not hinge on the propriety of a search of a visitor's belongings, we find the legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16926 - 2017-09-21
. Although the case did not hinge on the propriety of a search of a visitor's belongings, we find the legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Certification
correctly notes, in this case, the underlying facts surrounding Burch’s consent to search his cell phone
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297434 - 2020-10-20
correctly notes, in this case, the underlying facts surrounding Burch’s consent to search his cell phone
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297434 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
State v. David R. Olofson
of the search of his car. We conclude that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion that Olofson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11835 - 2017-09-21
of the search of his car. We conclude that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion that Olofson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11835 - 2017-09-21
State v. David R. Olofson
to be searched, he argues that the police did not have a right to detain him in this case because he was not near
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31
to be searched, he argues that the police did not have a right to detain him in this case because he was not near
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31
WI App 49 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP2238-CR Complete Title...
affidavit in this case contained ample evidence supporting a finding of probable cause to search Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141620 - 2015-06-23
affidavit in this case contained ample evidence supporting a finding of probable cause to search Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141620 - 2015-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in her response brief. And while Bert takes the time to identify these cases for us, his own briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929419 - 2025-03-18
in her response brief. And while Bert takes the time to identify these cases for us, his own briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929419 - 2025-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and signature block: The warrant in this case, though entitled “Search Warrant” and bearing the signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
and signature block: The warrant in this case, though entitled “Search Warrant” and bearing the signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 633, ¶45. ¶18 The “search warrant” in this case neither ordered nor directed law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40933 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 633, ¶45. ¶18 The “search warrant” in this case neither ordered nor directed law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 53
In the present case, we apply this two-step inquiry to determine whether the search of the passenger
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263864 - 2020-06-05
In the present case, we apply this two-step inquiry to determine whether the search of the passenger
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263864 - 2020-06-05
2008 WI App 166
the premises was. Id., ¶35. Whereas in the instant case, the search warrant was considerably narrower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34310 - 2008-11-11
the premises was. Id., ¶35. Whereas in the instant case, the search warrant was considerably narrower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34310 - 2008-11-11