Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20161 - 20170 of 29817 for des.
Search results 20161 - 20170 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Carlton B. Campbell
of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9503 - 2017-09-19
of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9503 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI App 22
a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164, ¶30, 266 Wis. 2d 719, 668 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31483 - 2008-03-11
a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164, ¶30, 266 Wis. 2d 719, 668 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31483 - 2008-03-11
[PDF]
James V. Holschbach v. Washington Park Manor
therefore affirm. ¶2 This case comes before us on summary judgment. We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7518 - 2017-09-19
therefore affirm. ¶2 This case comes before us on summary judgment. We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7518 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jefferson County Department of Human Services v. Volonna W.
assistance is a question of law, however, which we decide de novo. Id. To prevail, Volonna must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13212 - 2017-09-21
assistance is a question of law, however, which we decide de novo. Id. To prevail, Volonna must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13212 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott M. Sterr
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, we move directly to the suppression issue because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6121 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, we move directly to the suppression issue because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6121 - 2017-09-19
Town of Lyndon v. Gilbert D. Jensen
and the interpretation of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19336 - 2005-08-17
and the interpretation of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19336 - 2005-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s decision de novo.”4 State ex rel. Gehl v. Connors, 2007 WI App 238, ¶16, 306 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
the circuit court’s decision de novo.”4 State ex rel. Gehl v. Connors, 2007 WI App 238, ¶16, 306 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Keith A. Franszczak
de novo. Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364-65, 597 N.W.2d 687 (1999). ¶20 As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3994 - 2017-09-20
de novo. Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364-65, 597 N.W.2d 687 (1999). ¶20 As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3994 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the historical facts is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, ___ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37393 - 2014-09-15
to the historical facts is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, ___ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37393 - 2014-09-15