Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20161 - 20170 of 58458 for speedy trial.

[PDF] NOTICE
postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel in relation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30564 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
the trial court’s holding that it had personal jurisdiction. Kopke v. A. Hardtrodt, 2001 WI 99, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 In that motion, he claimed that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349971 - 2021-03-30

[PDF] State v. Virginia R. Ray
on appeal: (1) Did the trial court err by prohibiting her from using “defense of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5723 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
residential. The trial court ruled that the County violated the open meetings law and entered a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Steven B. Skrede v. John B. Spears
.3 (R.27:134-38). The trial court denied the motion and the trial proceeded. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10636 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. James M.O.
Services arises from a termination of parental rights jury trial where the jury found that the father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13143 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David Gallagher
postconviction relief. Gallagher argues that the trial court failed to determine that he understood the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4928 - 2017-09-19

State v. David Gallagher
. § 948.02(1),[1] and an order denying postconviction relief. Gallagher argues that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4928 - 2005-03-31

Robin R. Dasko v. Paula J. Kendziorski
appeals from a dismissal order. The trial court determined that the action was barred by the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10947 - 2005-03-31