Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20181 - 20190 of 39815 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 20181 - 20190 of 39815 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
of Sette. Porth’s defense counsel specifically asked: Q: [Tara Miller] gave you a verbal statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
of Sette. Porth’s defense counsel specifically asked: Q: [Tara Miller] gave you a verbal statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jennifer Lehman
of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13103 - 2005-03-31
of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13103 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
threatening to kill her, and that she may have made statements accusing Harris of these things “out of anger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
threatening to kill her, and that she may have made statements accusing Harris of these things “out of anger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. v. Linda L. Justmann
of § 425.109, Stats., and 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (1994); (3) denied her the right to make an oral statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10243 - 2005-03-31
of § 425.109, Stats., and 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (1994); (3) denied her the right to make an oral statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10243 - 2005-03-31
Mark E. Hoppe v. Town of Porter Board of Adjustment
the arguments of counsel, the board voted to deny the appeal, agreeing with one member’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31
the arguments of counsel, the board voted to deny the appeal, agreeing with one member’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Greg D. Griswold
statement does not satisfy us that this is a proper case for exercise of our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9345 - 2017-09-19
statement does not satisfy us that this is a proper case for exercise of our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9345 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Brantley
specifically pointed to Froelich’s and Brantley’s statements that he understood the elements of the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5776 - 2017-09-19
specifically pointed to Froelich’s and Brantley’s statements that he understood the elements of the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5776 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; misleading and false statements (misrepresentation); intentional tort; breach of contract; emotional stress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965302 - 2025-06-03
; misleading and false statements (misrepresentation); intentional tort; breach of contract; emotional stress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965302 - 2025-06-03
State v. Jose M. Jaimes
to this statement arguing it “assumes facts not in evidence.” The trial court overruled the objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24796 - 2007-04-29
to this statement arguing it “assumes facts not in evidence.” The trial court overruled the objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24796 - 2007-04-29
Scott M.H. v. Kathleen M.H.
case. Scott relies on the above statement in support of his waiver claim. However, we take note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12244 - 2005-03-31
case. Scott relies on the above statement in support of his waiver claim. However, we take note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12244 - 2005-03-31