Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 58479 for speedy trial.
State v. Brian K. Rundle
argues that: (1) the trial court compromised his right to confrontation and compulsory process when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13805 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) the trial court compromised his right to confrontation and compulsory process when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2009–10).1 Garrett argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
) (2009–10).1 Garrett argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
post-commitment motion. On appeal, Birkett argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21
post-commitment motion. On appeal, Birkett argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bernard A. James
in the challenge incarceration program under Wis. Stat. § 302.045(2)[2] was a new factor and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
in the challenge incarceration program under Wis. Stat. § 302.045(2)[2] was a new factor and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Newson
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7322 - 2017-09-20
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7322 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ruven Seibert
. Stat. ch. 980.[1] Seibert argues there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6713 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. ch. 980.[1] Seibert argues there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leroy W. Senn
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). Senn argues that: (1) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). Senn argues that: (1) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jean Sharafinski v. Leroy Sharafinski
an order in a divorce action, wherein the trial court decided that the settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14160 - 2014-09-15
an order in a divorce action, wherein the trial court decided that the settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14160 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Patti S.
. Patti argues that the trial 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6440 - 2017-09-19
. Patti argues that the trial 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6440 - 2017-09-19