Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Carole Hungerford v. State
2 PER CURIAM. Carole Hungerford and her son, Randall, both appeal a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11999 - 2017-09-21
2 PER CURIAM. Carole Hungerford and her son, Randall, both appeal a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11999 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric Hune
charges went to trial. The State presented evidence that Hune did not purchase tax stamps for the drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14808 - 2005-03-31
charges went to trial. The State presented evidence that Hune did not purchase tax stamps for the drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas M. Wilber
in haste. The trial court denied the motion. At the sentencing hearing, Wilber corrected some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16069 - 2017-09-21
in haste. The trial court denied the motion. At the sentencing hearing, Wilber corrected some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16069 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric Hune
counts of violating the State’s Drug Stamp Act. ¶3 All four charges went to trial. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14808 - 2017-09-21
counts of violating the State’s Drug Stamp Act. ¶3 All four charges went to trial. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14808 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the State after Froust presented her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106669 - 2017-09-21
trial, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the State after Froust presented her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106669 - 2017-09-21
Lisa Prince v. Zoning Board of Appeals for Rusk County
restriction. The trial court concluded that the board's decision was unreasonable and oppressive. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9358 - 2005-03-31
restriction. The trial court concluded that the board's decision was unreasonable and oppressive. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9358 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Lewis Small, Jr. v. Wtmj Television Station
. Small argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in the defendants' favor based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8728 - 2017-09-19
. Small argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in the defendants' favor based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8728 - 2017-09-19
James Lewis Small, Jr. v. Wtmj Television Station
, attorney fees and costs. Small argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8728 - 2005-03-31
, attorney fees and costs. Small argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8728 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Konaha
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Konaha argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4696 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Konaha argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4696 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald M. Vales
the effectiveness of his trial counsel. The court denied his motion without a hearing. Vales appeals from both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10065 - 2005-03-31
the effectiveness of his trial counsel. The court denied his motion without a hearing. Vales appeals from both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10065 - 2005-03-31