Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 58510 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that trial counsel was ineffective for erroneously advising him that the State had agreed to recommend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364804 - 2021-05-12

State v. Malcolm J. Campbell
the trial court relied on information about events that occurred after the original sentencing.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7937 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nathan O. Jones
that the allegations in the complaint were substantially true and could be used by the trial court as a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14024 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronald M. Vales
) and 939.641, STATS. Vales filed a postconviction motion challenging the effectiveness of his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10065 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ricky L. Sweeney
in the trial court. That argument fails for three reasons. First, this court may apply Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13821 - 2005-03-31

James Lewis Small, Jr. v. Wtmj Television Station
, attorney fees and costs. Small argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8728 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
FINE, J. Alpesh D. Shah appeals the trial court’s order finding that his refusal to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121174 - 2014-09-08

Lee J. Petrina v. James Barnard
wrongful eviction and invasion of their rights to private occupancy. They argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9701 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Secura Insurance v. Steve Boshardy, Jr.
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, a new trial. The issues are: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8255 - 2017-09-19

Michael R. Ott v. Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance Company
issued by Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance Company. The Otts challenge the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13031 - 2005-03-31