Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20241 - 20250 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20241 - 20250 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296057 - 2020-10-14
. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296057 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
Ira Lee Anderson-El v. Marianne Cooke
. 1993). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13736 - 2014-09-15
. 1993). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13736 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 1
to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45391 - 2014-09-15
to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Bank One Wisconsin v. Robert H. Kahl
facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5090 - 2017-09-19
facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5090 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marialyce B. Dorman v. Robert S. Hoover
a job choice is unreasonable presents a question of law that we determine de novo, see id., neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14945 - 2017-09-21
a job choice is unreasonable presents a question of law that we determine de novo, see id., neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Whittemore, 166 Wis. 2d 127, 131-32, 479 N.W.2d 566 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
of law that we review de novo. State v. Whittemore, 166 Wis. 2d 127, 131-32, 479 N.W.2d 566 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under a de novo standard. State v. David J.K., 190 Wis. 2d 726, 738, 528 N.W.2d 434 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175264 - 2017-09-21
under a de novo standard. State v. David J.K., 190 Wis. 2d 726, 738, 528 N.W.2d 434 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶11 When determining the deficiency prong, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77429 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶11 When determining the deficiency prong, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77429 - 2014-09-15
State v. Giles L. Smith
are not bound by the trial court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. State v. Curiel, No. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31
are not bound by the trial court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. State v. Curiel, No. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
interpreting that statute). Thus, Beerbohm asserts, we should review de novo the meaning of “public interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105841 - 2013-12-18
interpreting that statute). Thus, Beerbohm asserts, we should review de novo the meaning of “public interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105841 - 2013-12-18