Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Glenn E. Hadley
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11146 - 2017-09-19
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11146 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36338 - 2009-05-04
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36338 - 2009-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239, ¶11, 297 Wis. 2d 446, 724 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
is reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239, ¶11, 297 Wis. 2d 446, 724 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2119 Complete Title of...
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment determinations de novo, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114760 - 2015-06-03
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment determinations de novo, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114760 - 2015-06-03
2008 WI App 22
a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164, ¶30, 266 Wis. 2d 719, 668 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31483 - 2008-03-11
a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164, ¶30, 266 Wis. 2d 719, 668 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31483 - 2008-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
is appropriate. We construe a contract de novo, without deference to the trial court. Johnson v. Heritage Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36694 - 2009-06-03
is appropriate. We construe a contract de novo, without deference to the trial court. Johnson v. Heritage Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36694 - 2009-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Pamela A. Schmidt
which we review de novo. State v Sample, 215 Wis.2d 486, 494, 573 N.W.2d 187, 190 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13193 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. State v Sample, 215 Wis.2d 486, 494, 573 N.W.2d 187, 190 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13193 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 234
, which we review de novo. Id., ¶17. ¶13 A ministerial duty is one that is “absolute, certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26842 - 2006-11-20
, which we review de novo. Id., ¶17. ¶13 A ministerial duty is one that is “absolute, certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26842 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
level of deference, de novo review, applies “where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163729 - 2017-09-21
level of deference, de novo review, applies “where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163729 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Yolanda McClinton
submitted the lesser included offense is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9943 - 2017-09-19
submitted the lesser included offense is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9943 - 2017-09-19