Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 3970 for davie.

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
). Evelyn C.R., 2001 WI 110 at ¶17; City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 759-60, 595 N.W.2d 635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3921 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
District II April 24, 2013 To: Hon. J. Mac Davis Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County Courthouse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95823 - 2013-04-23

CA Blank Order
District II January 21, 2015 To: Hon. J. Mac Davis Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133088 - 2015-01-20

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
). Evelyn C.R., 2001 WI 110 at ¶17; City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 759-60, 595 N.W.2d 635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eddie L. Thomas
to that required by law.[5] See Davis v. Alabama, 596 F.2d 1214, 1221 (5th Cir. 1979) (evidence of past mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31

Lind Excavating & Landscaping, LLC v. David Cihlar
is uncontroverted.” Davis v. Psychology Examining Bd., 146 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 431 N.W.2d 730 (Ct. App. 1988). [4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19767 - 2005-10-04

William B. Diel v. State of Wisconsin-Labor and Industry Review Commission
based upon statements of the claimant which LIRC did not believe to be true. Davis v. Indus. Comm’n, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2780 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
Amendment and whether a sentence was excessive are virtually identical in Wisconsin.” State v. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael A. Smith
on the lesser-included offense instruction is a question of law. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8601 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Compare State v. Davis, 2011 WI App 147, ¶35 n.7, 337 Wis. 2d 688, 707 n.7, 808 N.W.2d 130, 140 n.7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98788 - 2014-09-15