Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20331 - 20340 of 30692 for pick ups.
Search results 20331 - 20340 of 30692 for pick ups.
State v. Deymond R. Turner
Suzanne. The officers set up a drug buy from Turner through a confidential informant and placed Turner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26274 - 2006-08-22
Suzanne. The officers set up a drug buy from Turner through a confidential informant and placed Turner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26274 - 2006-08-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
did it even affect Olender’s report that she returned to the apartment to catch Miller finishing up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
did it even affect Olender’s report that she returned to the apartment to catch Miller finishing up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
7 to follow the court’s instructions. Trial counsel’s follow-up with S.T. acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
7 to follow the court’s instructions. Trial counsel’s follow-up with S.T. acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
State v. Miyosha K. White
by the police as the driver of the car that showed up at the purchase sites and by “Q” as one of the parties who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
by the police as the driver of the car that showed up at the purchase sites and by “Q” as one of the parties who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, defense counsel asked Deputy Miller whether he recalled saying to another officer, “[O]bviously he’s up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
, defense counsel asked Deputy Miller whether he recalled saying to another officer, “[O]bviously he’s up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
2008 WI APP 134
was not released. Further, he acknowledged the rights he was giving up by entering his pleas. In short, the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33515 - 2008-08-26
was not released. Further, he acknowledged the rights he was giving up by entering his pleas. In short, the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33515 - 2008-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
Nash whether he understood that it could set an eligibility date greater than the statutory date, up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
Nash whether he understood that it could set an eligibility date greater than the statutory date, up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
State v. Charles Young-Cooper
explicit conduct.[1] In the form, Young-Cooper indicated that he was giving up his right to have the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14646 - 2005-03-31
explicit conduct.[1] In the form, Young-Cooper indicated that he was giving up his right to have the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14646 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tammy F.
for inspection and copying a document up to 48 hours before any proceeding. This means parties can review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
for inspection and copying a document up to 48 hours before any proceeding. This means parties can review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
Kelly S. Lee v. James M. Kent
per month. Adding the figures together, and rounding up for ease, the circuit court set James’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2779 - 2005-03-31
per month. Adding the figures together, and rounding up for ease, the circuit court set James’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2779 - 2005-03-31